Untitled Document
  Curriculum > SAc Themes >Impact Evaluation
Untitled Document
 
Untitled Document
Impact Evaluation
 
Untitled Document
Important Links
RTI Network
ANSA - Africa
Centre for Good Governance
COPSA - World Bank
CommGAP - World Bank
SASANet
Impact Evaluation

Impact Evaluation, as a tool, is a crucial link in the loop of programme design, feedback and performance improvement. Impact evaluation is predominantly quantitative although in the recent years qualitative and participatory research tools have been increasingly applied. According to the World Bank, the concept of impact evaluation deals in assessing the changes in the well-being of individuals that can be attributed to a particular project, program or policy. A number of definitions exist on what impact evaluation is and most of the definitions given more or less conclude that the broad functions of an impact evaluation is to study the welfare effect of a program, establish the causality of an effect, compare the actual observed outcomes of a project and assess the impact on a range of scales, varying from micro (individuals or households) to macro (entire community or state).
 
In implementing a Monitoring and Evaluation Project Cycle methodology we study the resource requirements of a project, the processes followed to utilize those resources for generating certain outputs, and the outputs themselves, whereas in Impact Evaluation, we go beyond what the project has produced in physical terms and study the changes that it has brought about in the project environment. Impact evaluation is based on certain key elements that help in assessing the impact of a programme or a project.

While linking Impact Evaluation and Social Accountability, the traditionally popular M&E tools (log frame, computer tracking, and budgetary control) are increasingly giving way to more flexible and participative tools which are context specific and aimed at ensuring the involvement of end beneficiaries in the impact evaluation process. However, the validity and rigor of the new approaches and the difficulty in reconciling them with the existing M&E tools poses big challenge for the development practitioners. The common M&E tools used in the Social Accountability initiatives are the participatory methods like Community Based Performance Monitoring, Community Score Cards, Social Audits, etc.

This module would introduce the reader to the concept of impact evaluation, the various contexts in which impact evaluation studies are conducted, the ways in which the outcomes of impact evaluation can be used to promote social accountability and, importantly, how to design an evaluation that would bring out the efficacy or impact of a social accountability initiative. Some of the important tools and methods of impact evaluation discussed include:

 
This module will primarily introduce the reader to the role of impact evaluation in promoting social accountability, various types of methods and tools of impact evaluation and ways of evaluating the impact of social accountability experiments.

Best Reads

Case Studies

.
 
 
Untitled Document
Books/Articles

GSDRC: Governance and Social Development Resource Centre (2007), ‘Monitoring and Evaluation Topic Guide’, International Development Department, University of Birmingham

Impact Evaluation: Methodological and Operational Issues, an ADB Publication (2006)
  more...
 
Working Papers /
Case Studies

Kusek & Rist, Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System

Clark Mari and Sartorius Rolf et al. (2004), ‘Monitoring & Evaluation: Some tools, method and approaches’, World Bank

Holvoet Nathalie & Renard Robrecht (2005), ‘putting the new aid paradigm to work: challenges for monitoring and evaluation’ IDPM-UA discussion paper

  more....
 
Bibliography

 
Untitled Document
© 2005 - South Asia Social Accountability Network. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions.
Joint initiative of Centre for Good Governance (CGG) and the South Asia Sustainable Development Division (SASSD) of the World Bank.