Untitled Document
  Curriculum > SAc Tools > Social Monitoring
Untitled Document
 
Untitled Document
Social Monitoring
 
Untitled Document
Important Links
RTI Network
ANSA - Africa
Centre for Good Governance
COPSA - World Bank
CommGAP - World Bank
SASANet
Social Monitoring -Participatory Budgeting
Participatory Budgeting is broadly defined as a mechanism or process through which citizens participate directly in the different phases of the budget formulation, decision making, and monitoring of budget execution. Public budgeting can be instrumental in increasing public expenditure transparency and in improving budget targeting. Since it is a useful vehicle to promote civic engagement and social learning, public budgeting has been referred to as an effective “School of Citizenship.”
Participatory budgeting’ has been defined as a process in which a range of stakeholders debate, analyze, probe and monitor decisions about public expenditure and investment. The stakeholders can include the public, poor and vulnerable groups including women, organized civil society, the private sector, representative assemblies or parliament, and donors.’ ( World Bank, n.d.) In general, ‘participatory budgeting’ can take place at three levels:

  • Budget formulation and analysis: citizens either determine their own priorities or hold the government accountable for previously agreed upon priorities concerning resource allocations;
  • Expenditure monitoring and tracking: citizens monitor expenditure to evaluate consistency between allocation and expenditure and the flow of funds to the agencies responsible for the delivery of services
  • Monitoring public service delivery: citizens monitor the quality of publicly provided goods and services and their impact as well as links of these to the budget.

Participatory Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS)

Participatory expenditure tracking survey is a quantitative survey of the supply side of public services. The unit of observation is typically a service facility and/or local government rather than a household or an enterprise. The survey collects information on facility characteristics, financial flows, outputs (services delivered), accountability arrangements, etc. PETS, as quantitative exercises separate from, but complementary to qualitative surveys on the perception of consumers on service delivery, have been found to be very influential in highlighting the use and abuse of public money.

 

  

 

 

 
 
Untitled Document
Books/Articles
Social Audit, a Peoples Manual, NIRD&CES
Social Audit: A Tool for  Performance  
Improvement and  Outcome Measurement, CGG
Citizen Report Card Surveys:
A Note on the Concept and
Methodology, World Bank
  more...
 
Working Papers /
Case Studies
Maharashtra, India: Improving Panchayat Service Delivery through
Community Score Cards,
Social Accountability Series,
South Asia Sustainable
Development Department
Public Services Provided by
Gram Panchayats in
Chattisgarh A Citizen Report Card,
Samarthan
Social Audits in Andhra Pradesh:
A Process in Evolution, EPW
  more...
 
Bibliography

 
Untitled Document
© 2005 - South Asia Social Accountability Network. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions.
Joint initiative of Centre for Good Governance (CGG) and the South Asia Sustainable Development Division (SASSD) of the World Bank.